Notebook N24_25JU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook N24_25JU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N24_25JU
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151013
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 02:13
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 80
2-Core 112
57% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 193
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 2425) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 3
Splatting 4
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 250GB-$90
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 333 309 299 295 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 388
Write 368
Mixed 306
SusWrite 311
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 34
109% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 247
207% 299 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
776GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 125 122 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 145
Write 126
Mixed 20
SusWrite 123
132% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 9905428-435.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 28 16 1 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15D5
Typical N24_25JU Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N24_25JU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback