Biostar A960D+V3

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A960D+V3 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '21 at 23:32
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 117 54% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 130 23% 163 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% PNY(196E 11D8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Lighting 74.6 Reflection 73.8 Parallax 65.3 61% 71.2 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 66.9 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH6-CE240-L1 240GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 156 76 80 81 16 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 166 Write 115 Mixed 138 SusWrite 87.5 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 19.1 72% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 42.2 DQ Mixed 26 22% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 88%
Tph00301000gb 0 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 925GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 112 116 118 119 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 112 68% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	120	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 27G2G3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960D+V3 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V3

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	30x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	25x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	14x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
NFS011SA356-6007200 256GBBench 56%, 274 samples	5x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	3x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	30x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16