Samsung RV413/RV513

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung RV413/RV513 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RV413/RV413
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110906
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '21 at 21:42
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Memory 27.7 1-Core 10.8 2-Core 15 13% 17.8 Pts	4-Core 20.1 8-Core 29.3 3% 24.7 Pts	64-Core 29.3 2% 29.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55 8,525 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 49 58 59 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 64.7 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 60.2 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB 5,422 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.18% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2.7 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 8.18% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RV413/RV513 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV413/RV513

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	6x
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
BarraCuda Q1 SSD 480GBSeagateBench 74%, 20 samples	1x
12 8GB SSD3Bench 56%, 10 samples	1x

RAM
AD73I1B0873EV 1x2GBAdataBench 18%, 360 samples	1x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 27%, 28 samples	1x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Samsung RV413/RV513

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Samsung RV413/RV513

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)