Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 133
60% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 304
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2828 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 183
Parallax 158
94% 152 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 199
Splatting 139
131% 162 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 391 423 452 453 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 374
SusWrite 426
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 53.3
175% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 260
195% 260 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 40 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 134
Write 41.1
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 41.4
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
471GB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 136
Write 40.4
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 42.5
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback