Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 176
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 379
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 55.2
45% 57.5 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 49.9
46% 57.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 120GB SSD 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 100 115 118 69 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 235
Write 120
Mixed 124
SusWrite 93.5
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 14.5
69% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 22.5
50% 103 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
70GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 67 70 65 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 61.4
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 64.2
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 21.9
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 17.1
16% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
117GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 22.9
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 15.4
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 0A94 D3R4GL16A8R 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 7R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 14% 86 281 195 60 18.5" 1366 768 SAM0B36 S19D300
History: Score 45: 9R 0G 0B | Score 50: 7R 5G 0B
Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $191
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback