Lenovo 90N900ENMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90N900ENMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370A
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 12:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 795
79% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 96
Parallax 92.3
79% 95 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 86.5
Splatting 77.8
77% 96.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MEE1OWX 512GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.2Q0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 394 322 322 316 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,575
Write 874
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 355
213% 960 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 67.5
235% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 306
343% 583 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 190%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CVF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 23
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical 90N900ENMW Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 90N900ENMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback