Notebook W230SS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook W230SS  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W230SS
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140415
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 10:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 211
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 523
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 2300) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 17
Parallax 7.3
3% 9.4 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJMS600M1TB 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 417 410 412 405 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 382
Mixed 376
SusWrite 410
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 29.6
136% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 44.7
83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 98%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 434 425 427 419 422 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 426
Mixed 396
SusWrite 425
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 28.3
134% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 40.7
88% 173 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G1600L2S Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W230SS Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W230SS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback