Medion H67H2-EM

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion H67H2-EM (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H67H2-EM
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110922
Uptime	16.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '21 at 09:46
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 471 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 73.8 57% 72.5 fps	MRender 64.5 Gravity 69 Splatting 0.3 32% 44.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 89 32 131 17 32 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.2% Poor	Read 210 Write 123 Mixed 124 SusWrite 67 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 10.5 42% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 23.2 DQ Mixed 21.3 16% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$79 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 74 75 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 117 Write 131 Mixed 68 SusWrite 72.9 72% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 12GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 69.6 57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	40"	1280 720	SAM0AC6 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Medion H67H2-EM

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	39x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	3x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	5x
GeForce GT 545NvidiaBench 6%, 2,995 samples	4x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 228 samples	7x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 550 samples	6x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 49%, 2,386 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $508	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16