ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP SG3-345FR-m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP SG3-345FR-m (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AAF
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100423
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '21 at 21:11
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 245 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 76.4 1-Core 41.7 2-Core 76.8 44% 65 Pts	4-Core 78.8 8-Core 78.4 11% 78.6 Pts	64-Core 82.6 5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.65% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.4 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.7 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.8 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.65% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 402GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 88 73 25 14 20 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 114 Write 109 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 54.1 62% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 8.8 3.3 3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 20.8 Write 21.8 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 7.9 23% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.4 148% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 74%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 58GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 6 4% 6 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 174GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 17 5.9 4.7 3.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 26.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 12.9 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 3GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7 8.3 3.3 3.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 25 Write 22.3 SusWrite 5.1 20% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.3 61% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.1% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 7.6 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback