Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 19:55
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 196
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 369
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 62
40% 49.3 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 25.4
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 126 130 129 127 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
930GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 191 187 190 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 176
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 186
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 2R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 10% 58 143 88 30 34" 3440 1440 PHL093D PHL 345B1C
History: Score 32: 5R 1G 4B | Score 22: 2R 4G 0B
Typical H81M-HDS R2.0 Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback