Asus CG8270

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus CG8270 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8270
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 95 2-Core 173 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 457 47% 380 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XFX(1682 3001) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.2% Below average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 36.8 Parallax 41.1 39% 41.9 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 43.6 Splatting 21.8 25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 64GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS.54.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 39 83 83 85 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 325 Write 108 Mixed 59.6 SusWrite 72.4 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 7.4 37% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 8 8% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 895GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 193 197 194 199 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 179 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 196 121% 165 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HY64C1C1624ZY 04CB HY64C1C1624ZY 04CB HY64C1C1624ZY Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.5"	1280 720	WOR6236 TERRA 6236W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	18x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	11x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GBUnknownBench 54%, 1,334 samples	13x
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	12x
EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GBAdataBench 55%, 601 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16