Asus X441NC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X441NC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X441NC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 12:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 29.7
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 97.3
32% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 810M
Asus(1043 133E) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.63 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.4
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 63 51 75 68 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 306
Write 228
Mixed 140
SusWrite 85.7
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 4.7
24% 7.57 MB/s
DQ Read 5
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 18.7
18% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 257
16% 257 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1493
Typical X441NC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X441NC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback