Asus A55BM-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A55BM-E  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 05:52
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 56.4
45% 64 Pts
4-Core 58.2
8-Core 58.7
8% 58.5 Pts
64-Core 55.7
3% 55.7 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 28 14 15 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 41.9
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 24.7
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 42%
Samsung HM060HI 60GB
6GB free
Firmware: YD100-18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 15 18 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 31.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 16.5
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 2R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 13% 23 14 10 60 72.3" 1920 1080 SNY6E02 SONY TV
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 11: 2R 0G 1B
Typical A55BM-E Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback