EVOO EG-LP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemEVOO EG-LP4  (all builds)
MotherboardEVOO GK5CP5X
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 18:30
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 173
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 510
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 30
Parallax 8.1
5% 14.9 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 126 115 18 63 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 403
Write 349
Mixed 356
SusWrite 75.3
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 25.5
105% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 1.4
55% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2666A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0625
Typical EG-LP4 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: EVOO EG-LP4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback