AMD 990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	AMD 990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121023
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '21 at 05:03
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 130 55% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 317 34% 274 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.5% Good	Lighting 84.4 Reflection 79.3 Parallax 70.4 69% 78 fps	MRender 60.4 Gravity 76.9 Splatting 68 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 71 65 68 64 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 136 Write 102 Mixed 110 SusWrite 69 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 17.5 61% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 57.4 57% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 240GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 59 59 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 50.4 Write 48.9 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 59 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 10.3 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 34: 3R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
34%	48%	29	198	95	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0D32 C27F390

History: Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 16: 0R 3G 7B | Score 34: 3R 4G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: AMD 990FXA-UD3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	19x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	7x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	4x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	2x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $68Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	6x
CS90 0 1TB SSDPNYBench 67%, 72 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 254 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,425 samples	2x
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16