Asus B250M-C PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B250M-C PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 03:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 689
66% 547 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.1 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 11.2
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN520 NVMe WDC 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 207 207 207 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 752
Write 589
Mixed 680
SusWrite 216
125% 559 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 70.2
247% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 317
282% 420 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 141%
Great: 194%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
336GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 98
Write 88.7
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 61.8
51% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M-C PRO Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B250M-C PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback