ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM eServer x226-[8488PEJ]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	IBM eServer x226-[8488PEJ]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM MSI-9151 Boards
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz 14 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU#1 , 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 48.5 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 49.6 27% 41 Pts	4-Core 50.2 8-Core 50.5 7% 50.3 Pts	64-Core 49.1 3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 104 106 86 107 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 121 Write 99.6 Mixed 32 SusWrite 105 65% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 103%
Ibm-esxs MAW3073NC FN 73GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 68GB free Firmware: C206 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 39 33 40 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.7% Below average	Read 81.2 Write 42.1 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 39.4 39% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 45%
Ibm-esxs MAW3073NC FN 73GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 68GB free Firmware: C206 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 39 34 40 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.3% Below average	Read 82.9 Write 41.6 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 39.7 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 45%
Ibm-esxs MAW3073NC FN 73GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 68GB free Firmware: C206 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 40 35 41 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.6% Below average	Read 83.9 Write 41 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 40 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 45%
Ibm-esxs MAW3073NC FN 73GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 68GB free Firmware: C206 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 40 35 41 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.3% Below average	Read 82.7 Write 41.6 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 40 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 174% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 45%
Ibm-esxs MAW3073NC FN 73GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 68GB free Firmware: C206 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 40 35 41 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.1% Below average	Read 81.9 Write 42 Mixed 47.9 SusWrite 40.1 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.36% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.36% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback