bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory344GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 344GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory336.5 GB free of 344 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 57.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
64% 119 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 806
71% 603 Pts
64-Core 1,458
90% 1,458 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-8Q
Nvidia(10DE 1150) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.6% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
48% 58.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 432
Write 228
Mixed 342
SusWrite 34.9
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 9.3
32% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 25.4
19% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 344GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 33.4
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 23 2 60 29.7" 1920 1080 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback