Asrock A320M-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-ITX  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 161
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 254
39% 283 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.9
34% 40.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 27.9
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 1051 1051 1019 1033 1026 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,453
SusWrite 1,045
341% 1,519 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 49.8
169% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 390
285% 375 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 207%
Great: 372%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 117 117 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 172
Write 121
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 116
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 5R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 37% 51 180 17 60 27" 1920 1080 AUS27C0 ASUS VZ279HE
Typical A320M-ITX Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $500
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback