Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 1,114
97% 824 Pts
64-Core 2825
175% 2825 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 326
Reflection 286
Parallax 322
266% 312 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 258
Splatting 183
208% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 217%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
675GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 2300 2306 2329 2327 2314 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 2,311
Mixed 1,610
SusWrite 2,310
493% 2,193 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 71.7
237% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 605
457% 615 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 344%
Great: 425%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 980 1TB
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 871 864 867 870 869 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 1167
Mixed 1,280
SusWrite 869
244% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 8
27% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 483
373% 512 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 124%
Great: 396%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 898 904 909 909 909 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 745
Write 899
Mixed 628
SusWrite 905
180% 794 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 7.8
32% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 245
203% 286 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 429%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 450 451 452 452 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 448
Write 452
Mixed 415
SusWrite 451
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 12.4
41% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 120
100% 140 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZN 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 44.2
140% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 36.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 165 31.5" 1280 720 AUS3220 ASUS XG32VC
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO Builds (Compare 3,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback