Lenovo 20RBS5MJ00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20RBS5MJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20RBS5MJ00
Memory1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 10:38
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 233
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 316
37% 284 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 5079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.4
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256-D22 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2S222
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,192
Write 781
Mixed 816
206% 929 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 19.9
126% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 444
357% 511 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 149%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
240GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 20 0 13 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 32
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 22.3
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 30 27" 1280 720 PHLC18F PHL 276E8V
Typical 20RBS5MJ00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20RBS5MJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback