Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130123
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '21 at 04:18
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6120 Six-Core 1,739 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 72 2-Core 131 58% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 304 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 49.6 Parallax 59.5 39% 52.2 fps	MRender 48.5 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 34.6 34% 43 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 137 120 131 120 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 405 Write 330 Mixed 190 SusWrite 143 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 15.3 71% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 34.6 DQ Mixed 33 35% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 56%
Adata SU 635 240GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 177GB free Firmware: V8X02c08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 338 338 335 333 329 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 11% Great: 60%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 1,935 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 9GB free, PID c75c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 13 13 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	7.68% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 2.2 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 11.6 16% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.68% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 4x4GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 16.8 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 14.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	40"	1280 720	TSB0206 TOSHIBA-TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	143x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	28x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	24x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	44x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	28x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16