Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 524
70% 521 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
85% 106 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.7
80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 675 638 644 647 645 642 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,284
Write 1,065
Mixed 554
SusWrite 649
198% 888 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 62.8
217% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 827
672% 956 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 204%
Great: 254%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
38GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 74 64 51 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
61% Good
Read 396
Write 366
Mixed 343
SusWrite 76.2
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 19.7
104% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 11
68% 151 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61%
Great: 78%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 175 187 188 170 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 123
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 176
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 105%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 2TB
819GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 160 158 158 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 155
Write 177
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 158
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 35.9
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 29.6
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 6R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 29% 41 348 288 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D2C C24F390
History: Score 38: 5R 3G 4B | Score 46: 6R 5G 1B
Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback