Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E751

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E751  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB223
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130426
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 62.4
36% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 197
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 49 18 26 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 263
Write 155
Mixed 284
SusWrite 55.6
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 13.4
48% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 72.1
73% 121 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 FUJ5612
Typical LIFEBOOK E751 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E751

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback