Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KC  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 866
84% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 126
Parallax 7.5
5% 46.5 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ESR512GTLCG-EAC- 512GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2259 2316 1057 767 773 788 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,569
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,625
SusWrite 1,327
384% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63.6
208% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,043
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 940
705% 944 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 251%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 24.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004B
Typical GA-G5 KC Builds (Compare 1,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback