Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 07 '17 at 04:09
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 25
2-Core 48.9
33% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 47.9
8-Core 65.1
7% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 35.7
30% 34.1 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 27.3
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 108
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.38
95% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FH8N6LCSFG 6GB
333, 333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.6
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback