MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 07:22
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 167
2-Core 334
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 1084
106% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,593
99% 1,593 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 191
Parallax 143
116% 159 fps
MRender 302
Gravity 231
Splatting 165
183% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 131%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2078 788 792 792 796 794 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,674
Write 2,517
Mixed 1,832
SusWrite 1,007
449% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 99.2
330% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1,175
DQ Mixed 1,256
945% 1,265 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 328%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
891GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 497 496 497 497 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 495
Mixed 450
SusWrite 496
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 61
210% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 133%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 33.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 36.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $896
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback