bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091119
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 01:10
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 112
52% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 78.7
8-Core 146
14% 112 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Intel(8086 0036) 219MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD120G 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 123 126 135 151 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 149
Write 132
Mixed 132
SusWrite 124
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 5.1
22% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 73%
Teutons Platinum SSD 256GB
115GB free
Firmware: H210123a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 196 185 189 187 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 189
Write 164
Mixed 187
SusWrite 180
41% 180 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 18.5
67% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 27.9
24% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 5
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 1.3
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback