Asus X555BP

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X555BP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X555BP
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190513
Uptime	10.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '21 at 00:24
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	KHM-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 49.3 2-Core 74.8 34% 55.2 Pts	4-Core 80.2 8-Core 78.2 11% 79.2 Pts	64-Core 45.6 3% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 13D0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 2.7 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hy-vs-820 PRO 256G 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2011XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 182 110 75 127 218 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 382 Write 294 Mixed 285 SusWrite 140 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 27.4 96% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 83.5 DQ Mixed 102 74% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 405GB free Firmware: AM0B3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 83 96 92 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 91.3 59% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Samsung K4A4G085WE-BCPB 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2400, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.2 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	34	25	15	60	15.5"	1366 768	CMN15C9

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X555BP Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X555BP

CPU
A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 28%, 14,746 samples	33x
A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 30%, 6,306 samples	27x
E2-9010 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 28%, 275 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	60x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	2x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	2x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
SA400S37/240G 240GBKingstonBench 61%, 355 samples	2x

RAM
K4A4G085WE-BCPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 21%, 388 samples	15x
MT40A512M8RH-083E:B 1x4GBMicronBench 21%, 272 samples	12x
K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 22%, 816 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16