HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '21 at 00:16
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 659 67% 545 Pts	64-Core 834 52% 834 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.2% Very good	Lighting 85.1 Reflection 92.8 Parallax 87.4 69% 88.4 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 77.7 Splatting 78.1 75% 93.7 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 356 435 360 383 408 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,595 Write 1,134 Mixed 1,307 SusWrite 394 247% 1,108 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 37.3 138% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 781 DQ Write 82.3 DQ Mixed 156 184% 340 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$373 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 1TB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 37 44 42 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 90% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16S4B.16FE 2x16GB 721 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81% Excellent	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 25.2 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 25.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 43: 7R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
43%	17%	75	293	208	144	17.3"	1920 1080	AUO449D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx Builds (Compare 1,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,293x
Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples	113x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	452x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	413x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	320x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	261x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	207x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	98x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	382x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	121x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	113x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16