Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 20:12
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 226
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 650
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.4% Poor
Lighting 28.2
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 29.1
23% 25.7 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 26.8
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1317
Write 1,734
Mixed 286
247% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 5.4
63% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 208
150% 195 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 305%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
264GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 76 89 66 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 372
Write 121
Mixed 253
SusWrite 93.5
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 19.1
100% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 0.1
53% 123 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
514GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 138 137 139 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 136
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
349GB free, PID 00b9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 16 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 20
Write 18.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 15.8
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
131GB free, PID 00b9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 2.1 2 2.2 2 2.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 18.7
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 2.5
19% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 13%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
246GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 72 74 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 58
Write 58.4
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 72.4
78% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 43%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
71GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 40.9
51% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback