MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 11:58
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 300
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 887
78% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6601) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.30.11.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 62.2
24% 39.7 fps
MRender 49.1
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 35.6
31% 38 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1564 1385 1369 1395 1372 1378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,366
Write 2,160
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 1,411
423% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 60.6
201% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 668
533% 769 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 280%
Great: 410%
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 1TB
332GB free
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1925 1883 2017 1347 927 938 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 1,777
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 1,506
352% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 57
173% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1403
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 722
586% 858 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 243%
Great: 296%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
118GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 174 175 176 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 433
Write 180
Mixed 185
SusWrite 175
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 22
83% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 97.5
90% 145 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
256GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 162 161 162 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 149
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 160
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 38.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 39.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 9R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 54% 26 92 26 144 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM0FDE C32JG5x
History: Score 45: 6R 5G 0B | Score 60: 9R 5G 0B
Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback