Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FLC_A412FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FLC_A412FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FLC
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 11:25
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 428
50% 385 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 167F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 18.2
15% 19.7 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 16.2
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme V-GEN10SM20AR256MTNVME 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 218 218 179 363 358 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
137% Outstanding
Read 1,511
Write 588
Mixed 131
SusWrite 285
136% 629 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 20.6
121% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 445
357% 505 MB/s
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
395GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 84 79 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 86
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 83.2
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
190% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 0A94 D4R4GS26A8R 8GB
2800, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 6R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 14% 87 61 15 75 23.8" 1920 1080 VSC9939 VX2476 Series
History: Score 27: 0R 9G 0B | Score 71: 10R 7G 0B | Score 40: 6R 2G 4B
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FLC_A412FL Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FLC_A412FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback