Lenovo 2349NL5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2349NL5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349NL5
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 401
41% 333 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 118 86 114 87 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 436
Write 386
Mixed 335
SusWrite 126
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 25.3
83% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 165
147% 221 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 0443 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 50 14" 1280 720 LEN40A1
Typical 2349NL5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349NL5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback