Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-E/M.2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 22:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 210
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 319
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 10.1
5% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 140 143 92 39 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62% Good
Read 344
Write 334
Mixed 300
SusWrite 74.9
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 25.4
117% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 76.9
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 11.7
62% 133 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FAR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 18.5" 1280 720 SAM0B35 S19D300
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback