HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829D
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 20:21
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 454
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 9.5
9% 11.2 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 12.5
9% 11 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 439 396 345 350 349 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 457
Mixed 428
SusWrite 379
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 56.3
192% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
133GB free
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 1606 1675 1721 1033 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,444
Write 1,599
Mixed 1,165
SusWrite 1,319
363% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.3
213% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,105
806% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 288%
Great: 332%
Valuegist ST-240G 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 419 418 406 416 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 421
Mixed 394
SusWrite 417
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 22.3
122% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 31.5
83% 171 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
765GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 166 168 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 156
Mixed 110
SusWrite 168
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S1ME-4 - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S1ME-4 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 24.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27AE ASUS VP278
Typical ProDesk 600 G3 MT Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback