Intel DZ68DB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DZ68DB__
MotherboardIntel DZ68DB  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 179
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 352
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3650) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 17
Parallax 21.5
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.8
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 22 23 23 27 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 99.3
Write 91
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 31.2
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3120827AS 120GB-$38
33GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 11.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 41.6
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24%
Great: 32%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
582GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 27
Write 20.3
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 26
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA MK7559GSXP 750GB
290GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Read 0.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.68 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 20%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
219GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 32.3
Mixed 17
SusWrite 33.8
38% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DZ68DB Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DZ68DB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback