Asus K43SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus K43SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K43SJ
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110715
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 42
2-Core 75.6
42% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 96.6
8-Core 94.2
13% 95.4 Pts
64-Core 88.5
6% 88.5 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Asus(1043 1742) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.57
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen12sm20ar256sdk 256GB 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 27 27 24 27 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 384
Write 223
Mixed 324
SusWrite 48.7
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 11.9
51% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 48.9
63% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
181GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 58 58 60 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 57.7
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 58.3
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88D0NS-CG 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 14" 1280 720 LGD02F8
Typical K43SJ Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K43SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback