Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,116
100% 845 Pts
64-Core 2,198
136% 2,198 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 252
Reflection 251
Parallax 507
206% 337 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 199
Splatting 288
236% 290 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 193%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1231 1248 1247 1246 1209 1190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,029
Write 1,303
Mixed 788
SusWrite 1,229
298% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 62.3
236% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,183
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 437
414% 670 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 263%
Great: 283%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
123GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 740 707 677 653 626 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,086
Write 1,259
Mixed 779
SusWrite 706
267% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 64.4
239% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1280
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 450
430% 702 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 237%
Great: 283%
Samsung SM841 mSATA 256GB
113GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 43 26 35 36 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 289
Write 88
Mixed 126
SusWrite 42.9
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.2
40% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB
209GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 445 429 444 454 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 516
Write 491
Mixed 402
SusWrite 440
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 11.5
67% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 154
134% 197 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 221%
External RAID 6TB
1TB free, PID 0511
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 38 40 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.1
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 39.6
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 45.7
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback