To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '21 at 15:25
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 108 46% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 415 39% 322 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 8% AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	8.33% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 9.9 9% 10.7 fps	MRender 9.3 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.8 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.33% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 115 83 19 110 72 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 200 Write 106 Mixed 125 SusWrite 86.7 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 8.5 33% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 55.7 DQ Write 54.7 DQ Mixed 42 35% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 85%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 112 111 112 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 96.4 Write 110 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 111 128% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB 1,639 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 29.2 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ78A7 BenQ GL2450H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	724x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	283x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	269x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16