Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 218
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 595
65% 515 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.3% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 63.5
54% 66.8 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 66
Splatting 63.5
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 239 240 238 259 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 332
Write 236
Mixed 253
SusWrite 248
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 36.2
129% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 156
117% 157 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
404GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 263 255 260 254 252 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
386GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 161
Write 142
Mixed 122
SusWrite 95.8
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 1TB
215GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 43 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 40.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 42.9
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 3R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 30% 23 338 267 30 32" 1920 1080 MJI0041 marantz-AVR
Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback