Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 71.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 827
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 96.6
55% 74.5 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 40.9
45% 57.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1908 910 695 717 720 710 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,099
Write 2,106
Mixed 1,437
SusWrite 944
369% 1,647 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 69.8
256% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 1,091
826% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 270%
Great: 355%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 554 542 550 559 544 555 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 560
Mixed 576
SusWrite 551
166% 750 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 40.8
134% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 456
341% 450 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 148%
Great: 273%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 169 180 198 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 134
Write 152
Mixed 78
SusWrite 179
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Chun Well CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 30.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 30.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 6R 8G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 12% 129 224 149 60 34.1" 3440 1440 GSM772B LG HDR WQHD
History: Score 28: 1R 5G 8B | Score 56: 6R 8G 2B
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback