To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 390
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 36.7
30% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 27
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 176 102 32 151 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 236
Write 151
Mixed 172
SusWrite 112
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 22.9
84% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 101
95% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 100%
USB Flash Disk 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 14 16 15 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 14.6
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 14.8
21% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
98% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TXD38GB-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 4R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 14% 96 315 242 60 72.3" 1360 768 GSM0001 LG TV
History: Score 29: 1R 5G 9B | Score 33: 4R 2G 7B
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback