Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 21:29
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 267
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4400(PHDGD Skylake v2.0)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 2.0.64.2016
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 5.5
3% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.8
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 129 88 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 470
Write 264
Mixed 330
SusWrite 147
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 36.8
152% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 179
159% 237 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 86%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
278GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 83 86 89 86 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 83
Write 35.2
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 83.4
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 21
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-DS2 Builds (Compare 3,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2 - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback