HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration424 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 103
45% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 186
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS2ZC360
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 52 49 63 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 44
Write 54.2
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 51.2
30% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 4R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 7% 119 50 28 60 15.6" 1536 864 LGD0259
History: Score 18: 2R 2G 2B | Score 18: 1R 3G 4B | Score 26: 4R 1G 3B | Score 17: 3R 0G 2B | Score 8: 0R 1G 5B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 19: 3R 1G 1B | Score 26: 4R 1G 3B
Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback