Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 11:08
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 189
2-Core 377
116% 220 Pts
4-Core 732
8-Core 1,222
119% 977 Pts
64-Core 1,754
108% 1,754 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 115%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 5096 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 236
Parallax 230
214% 243 fps
MRender 273
Gravity 172
Splatting 141
153% 195 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 175%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU5SH017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 119 52 563 32 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 938
Mixed 895
SusWrite 291
177% 789 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 74.8
300% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 493
428% 614 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 180%
Great: 205%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3775 3931 3937 3913 3923 3947 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
486% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 3,430
Mixed 2,085
SusWrite 3,904
642% 2,817 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 90.3
326% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,769
DQ Write 1,520
DQ Mixed 1,751
1,283% 1,680 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 486%
Great: 502%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 480 481 470 472 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 481
Mixed 418
SusWrite 474
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 57.7
197% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 147 146 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 87
SusWrite 143
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-36A180U 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 40.3
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 37
108% 37.7 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 9R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 31% 45 284 200 144 27" 2560 1440 ACR0408 XB270HU
Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback