Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84 2,640 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 27.5 27% 35.1 Pts	4-Core 30.3 8-Core 32.6 4% 31.4 Pts	64-Core 31 2% 31 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SB1M-128G 128GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 69 67 70 88 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 117 Write 93.9 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 72.6 20% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 19.6 69% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 55.8 DQ Mixed 27.8 25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 50%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 190GB free Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 97 98 98 99 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	56% Above average	Read 103 Write 25.5 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 92.3 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 3 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	5x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+AMDBench 36%, 2,253 samples	4x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 6150NvidiaBench 0%, 477 samples	6x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	2x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $85

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16