Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 08:03
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 74
2-Core 138
58% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 442
43% 355 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
EVGA(3842 1160) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.9% Good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 86.6
Parallax 76.6
71% 83.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 70.2
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 339 351 366 196 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 416
Write 145
Mixed 305
SusWrite 272
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 31.1
115% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 179
148% 210 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 102%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 15
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
138% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 25% 20 107 3 60 24" 1920 1080 ONN0101 100002487
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback