Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime6 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 05:52
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 152
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 204
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 165 171 176 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 125
Write 161
Mixed 144
SusWrite 169
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 21.4
70% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 28.5
24% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
355GB free
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 88 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 89.5
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 701 HRX0000 32H4+
Typical P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback