Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 01:41
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7750
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 89.6
39% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 89.1
12% 89.4 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721680PLA 82GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P21O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 9.3 10 8.9 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 67.1
Write 65.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 16.6
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
75GB free
Firmware: PF2OA21B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 46 51 51 55 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 49.4
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 51.8
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%
Maxtor 6E040L0 41GB-$27
37GB free
Firmware: NAR61590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 46 50 51 55 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 56
Write 56.6
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 51.7
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 31%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RM12864AA667.8FE NA2D001G30D 2GB
533, 533 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback